{"id":1793,"date":"2024-03-12T13:00:37","date_gmt":"2024-03-12T12:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sourceminds.nl\/?p=1793"},"modified":"2025-06-25T12:59:44","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T10:59:44","slug":"stay-or-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sourceminds.nl\/en\/blogs\/stay-or-change\/","title":{"rendered":"Stay or change?"},"content":{"rendered":"Readtime:<\/span> 2<\/span> min<\/span><\/span>\n

When your IT service provider underperforms, you face a crucial decision: stay or change? It's a dilemma many companies encounter. On one hand, there's the notion of switching to a new supplier, hoping for better service. On the other hand, there's the argument to invest in improving the relationship with the existing supplier and the quality of their services.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Switching to a new IT service provider may seem appealing, especially if the current one repeatedly disappoints. A new provider may bring fresh ideas and innovative solutions that could better suit your company's needs. It could also be an opportunity to benefit from competitive rates or improved service terms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Echter, overstappen naar een nieuwe leverancier brengt ook risico's met zich mee. Het brengt grote investeringen met zich mee, het kost tijd en middelen om een nieuwe leverancier te selecteren, contracten op te stellen en over te stappen op nieuwe omgevingen. Elke verandering brengt in het begin vaak een \u2018dip\u2019 in de dienstverleningservaring. Bovendien is er geen garantie dat de nieuwe leverancier betere prestaties zal leveren en het opbouwen van een nieuwe relatie met de nieuwe leverancier tijd kost. Het is mogelijk dat je uiteindelijk tegen dezelfde problemen aanloopt, maar dan met een andere partij. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the other hand, investing in the relationship with the existing IT service provider can yield results. By openly communicating expectations and concerns, solutions can be worked on collaboratively. This includes redefining service delivery, collaboration methods, and setting joint concrete improvement goals. By investing in the existing relationship, you may retain the benefits of the knowledge the current provider has built about your company and systems, saving effort on selection and migration processes, and above all, building a new relationship. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don't get me wrong, the bottom line is that a supplier should deliver on what is agreed upon. However, it's often a combination of unclear communication, collaboration, and expectations that cause issues between parties. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

There's no one-size-fits-all answer to this decision, but make sure to carefully weigh which option offers the most value in the long run.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#vandorpmanagementconsultancy<\/strong>\u00a0#itcontracting<\/strong>\u00a0#itsourcing<\/strong>\u00a0#itstrategy<\/strong>\u00a0#contractlifecyclemanagment\u00a0#contractmanagement<\/strong>\u00a0#itsm<\/strong> #sourceminds<\/strong><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Leestijd:<\/span> 2<\/span> min<\/span><\/span>Bij slechte prestaties van je IT-dienstverlener sta je voor een belangrijke beslissing: blijven of veranderen? Het is een dilemma dat veel bedrijven tegenkomen. Aan de ene kant is er het idee om over te stappen naar een nieuwe leverancier, in de hoop betere service te krijgen. Aan de andere kant is er het argument om […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1794,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blogs"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t